You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 12, December 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Technique for Comparing Past Fundus Photographs With Present Fundus Condition

Howard Schatz, MD
San Francisco

Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(12):2244.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—I would like to suggest a technique that provides a simple and immediate comparison between a patient's previous fundus findings and his current fundus condition.

The traditional method of comparing current fundus findings with previous fundus photographs involves examining the fundus with the indirect ophthalmoscope and the room lights off. The examiner must turn the room lights on, take off the indirect ophthalmoscope, and examine color transparent slides from previous examinations with the room lights on. The physician must remember the image he has seen through the indirect ophthalmoscope while transferring his attention to the photographic image, or the physician can put the slides on a view box and look back and forth from the fundus view with the indirect ophthalmoscope to the view box to determine if fundus changes have occurred with time.

A better technique makes use of the red-free black-and-white fundus photographs on the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.