You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 93 No. 7, July 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Atlas of Veterinary Ophthalmoscopy

by Lionel F. Rubin, VMD, 470 pp, 25 illus & 182 pp of color plates, $75, Lea & Febiger Publishers, 1974.

Alan Bachrach, Jr., VMD, Reviewer
Columbus, Ohio

Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(7):546.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This well-illustrated volume will undoubtedly aid in filling the great void that has long been apparent in the annals of American veterinary ophthalmoscopy. The book is well-organized, and its ten chapters are presented in a logical sequence, the initial ones providing information on the examination of the ocular fundus and its interpretation. Included are brief discussions of direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy, biomicroscopy, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and electroretinography.

The largest chapter deals with the fundus of the dog, this being the most frequent companion and laboratory animal. Ensuing chapters are devoted to the fundus of the cat, horse, ruminants and pig, rat and rabbit, and monkey. "The Fundus in Experimental Drug Toxicity" is an essential chapter for anyone involved in pharmacologic and toxicologic evaluations. The brief concluding chapter on therapy of diseases of the fundus is terse; however, it should be considered as an added feature rather than an integral . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.