This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

P. CHALMERS JAMESON, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1932;8(5):654-670.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

On visiting different clinics, abroad and at home, and on interrogating various surgeons, one is struck by the fact that while there are many operations on ocular muscles in existence, usually only one is used by each surgeon or clinic, or one routine is practiced and advocated for the correction of most of the types of squint, and that this selection is based more on the surgeon's leaning toward a favored operation than on the consideration of that which is best adapted for the particular type of squint which exists.

It is my endeavor in this article to emphasize the necessity of a broad survey of securities which stabilize operations on muscles and the need of utilizing all the means which ophthalmology puts at one's disposal for the correction of muscular anomalies.

The following phases of the subject seem to be of special importance.

SECURITY OBTAINABLE BY METHODS TAKING . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
BROOKLYN

Footnotes
Read before the Meeting of the American Ophthalmological Society, New London, Conn., June 27, 1932.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?