You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 8 No. 4, October 1932 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

DEVELOPMENT OF THE HUMAN CORNEA

BENJAMIN RONES, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1932;8(4):568-575.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

During the last twenty years there have been two views of the development of the human cornea. Nussbaum1 supported the theory of Kölliker, that following the detachment of the lens vesicle the cells of the head mesoderm grew into the space between the ectoderm and the lens. This layer increased in thickness and then split into two portions, the anterior zone becoming the cornea, and the posterior layer forming the pupillary membrane and mesodermal portion of the iris. Descemet's mesothelium then appeared at a later stage and formed the posterior boundary layer of the cornea. As recently as 1928, Mann2 in "The Development of the Human Eye" supported this view. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the chief steps in the corneal development according to this view.

In figure 1, the lens has separated entirely from the surface ectoderm and lies in the optic cup. The head mesoderm has . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the Carnegie Embryological Laboratory and the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1932 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.