You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 75 No. 5, May 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (79)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gross Facility, Facility of Conventional Routes, and Pseudofacility of Aqueous Humor Outflow in the Cynomolgus Monkey

The Reduction in Aqueous Humor Formation Rate Caused by Moderate Increments in Intraocular Pressure

ANDERS BILL, MD; ERNST H. BÁRÁNY, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;75(5):665-673.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

There is no doubt that to a large extent the aqueous humor is formed by a secretory mechanism that delivers fluid into the posterior chamber from the ciliary processes. The posterior chamber aqueous humor exchanges with the surrounding tissues,1 and we do not know if this gives a net loss of aqueous humor volume or a gain before the fluid enters the anterior chamber by bulk flow. In the cynomolgus monkey the bulk outflow from this chamber, which may include some pinocytosis, occurs in part by way of Schlemm's canal into the general circulation (conventional outflow), and in part by way of uveoscleral routes into the episcleral tissues.2,3 The outflow through the conventional routes is pressure dependent, that is, it increases with an increase in intraocular pressure; the uveoscleral drainage, on the contrary, is very little, if at all, influenced by a moderate increase in intraocular pressure above . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Uppsala, Sweden

From the Institute of Pharmacology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Sept 24, 1965.

Reprint requests to Institute of Pharmacology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden (Dr. Bill).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.