You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 75 No. 3, March 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Neurophysiology (ed 2).

Edited by Theodore C. Ruch, PhD, and Harry D. Patton, PhD, MD. Price, $11. Pp 521, with no illustrations. W. B. Saunders Co., W Washington Sq, Philadelphia, Pa 19105, 1965.

Robert Jampel, MD, Reviewer

Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;75(3):451.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This volume consists of a reprint of the chapters devoted to neurophysiology in Howell's classic textbook of physiology. The book is meant for those whose primary interest is neurophysiology and who do not wish to invest in the larger textbook.

The authors have attempted to present neurophysiology "in depth," and in my opinion have achieved this objective. Neurophysiology is treated as a continuum which stretches from the physics of the neuron to the physiologic interpretation of the signs and symptoms of neurologic disease. Where necessary for clarification, the physics, mathematics, and physical chemistry of neurophysiological phenomena are explored.

Three chapters are devoted to vision. The first deals with the eye as an optical instrument, the second with vision, and the third with binocular vision and the central visual pathways. These chapters are excellently written and serve as excellent preliminary surveys of the field. The bibliographies at the end of each . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.