You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 75 No. 1, January 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HOMOCYSTINURIA

Victor A. McKusick, MD
Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, Md 21205

Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;75(1):150-151.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor:

The following information may be useful supplementation for your editorial on homocystinuria.1 The findings in 20 families, with 38 affected persons, were published in August.2 Many of the families were ascertained by screening the urine of patients with non-traumatic ectopia lentis and/or presumed Marfan syndrome. (The help of a considerable number of ophthalmologists in this on-going screening program is much appreciated.) At this writing, 30 families, containing 58 affected persons, have been detected. The following findings may be of particular interest to the ophthalmologist.

As many as 40% of patients have normal intelligence (several are college graduates), and in the patients judged to be retarded the degree of retardation varies widely. Homocystinuria was first detected by the study of patients with mental retardation. Hence, the impression was created that mental retardation is an invariable feature. However, screening programs in groups of retardates have had a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.