 |
 |

Disposable Gryophake—Clinical Evaluation
ROBERT D. MATTIS, MD;
HARRY R. BRADY, MD;
TJAKRASUDJATMA SUGANA, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;74(6):787-791.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Cryoprehensile cataract extraction is a new technique rapidly approaching perfection since Krwawicz1 in attempting to eliminate the factor of "unreliable methods of grasping the capsule" introduced his methanol-carbon dioxide ice cooled extractor in 1961. His instrument had three deficiencies: too short a freezing period, poor insulation about the tip, and crude technique for detaching tissues which accidentally became adherent to the extractor. However, the efficacy of the method was firmly established by him2 in 1963 when he reported the results on over 600 cases of all types of cataracts with less than 3% of ruptures of the capsule despite the fact that over 400 cases were of intumescent cataract. He noted the probability of a too-narrow corneoscleral section as a major cause of capsule rupture as well as suggesting capsular shrinkage produced by the freezing as an etiological factor.
Kelman and Cooper3 in 1963, using a liquid
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
St. Louis
Footnotes
Submitted for publication May 10, 1965.
Read before the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Alumni Meeting, Boston, April 26, 1965. From the Department of Ophthalmology, St. Louis University School of Medicine and University Hospitals.
Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, 1325 S Grand Blvd, St. Louis, Mo 63102.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|