You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 74 No. 5, November 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glaucoma and Corticosteroid Provocative Testing

BERNARD BECKER, MD; NORMAN BALLIN, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;74(5):621-624.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Patients with field loss due to primary open-angle glaucoma characteristically demonstrate tonographic abnormalities (Po/C> 100) after water drinking.1 A higher than normal prevalence of non-tasters of phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) has also been demonstrated in the primary open-angle glaucoma population.2

Recently topical corticosteroids have been shown to cause marked intraocular pressure elevations in patients with field loss from primary open-angle glaucoma.3 Pressure elevations of similar magnitude have also been noted in approximately 20% of glaucoma offspring without field loss.4 The present study examines the correlation of water provocative tonography, PTC taste testing, and steroid responsiveness among glaucoma offspring.

Material and Methods

A. Selection of Patients.

—Eighty-four offspring of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were subjected to testing. In each instance the index patient had characteristic field loss (arcuate scotoma). Offspring were selected so as to exclude those with evidence of cupping, field loss, or occludable angles. Forty-four . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

St. Louis

From the Department of Ophthalmology and the Oscar Johnson Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.


Footnotes

Submitted April 4, 1965.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis 63110 (Dr. Becker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.