You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 5, May 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Central Retinal Vein Occlusions and Chronic Simple Glaucoma

ROBERT M. DRYDEN, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73(5):659-663.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The fact that occlusions of the central vein of the retina are frequently followed by secondary glaucoma is well known, but the relationship between preexisting chronic simple glaucoma and the subsequent development of central retinal vein occlusion has received less emphasis. The latter of the above relationships was first reported by Verhoeff in 1913.1 Subsequently other investigators have reported frequent correlation of unilateral retinal vein occlusion and chronic simple glaucoma.2-9

The current two-part study was performed to document the clinical and pathological manifestations of this condition. In the first group of patients histologic confirmation of central retinal vein occlusion was noted in enucleated eyes. An attempt was made in this group to correlate central retinal vein occlusion and chronic simple glaucoma. The second part of the study was a clinical one designed to determine the relative incidence of these two conditions. In the second group there was no . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

San Francisco

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco 94122; Summer Fellow in Eye Pathology.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Oct 2, 1964.

Reprint requests to Dr. Dryden.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.