You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 4, April 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Do Oral Contraceptives Have Neuro-Ophthalmic Complications?

D. G. C.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73(4):461-462.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Oral contraceptives are now in wide use and are presumably here to stay. They have received tentative endorsement by professional societies. At the same time, several articles and editorials including a commendable directive from the pharmaceutical industry have cautioned against possible complications. It has been specifically suggested that oral contraceptives may be responsible for several cases of thromboembolism, including pelvic vein thrombosis, axillary artery thrombosis, thrombophlebitis of the legs, cerebrovascular accidents, and pulmonary embolism. A few of these have been fatal but since such complications may occur in persons not taking contraceptives, the relationship of the drugs to the thromboembolism is little more than an unproved impression at present (JAMA 185:776 [Sept 7] 1963).

We wish here to draw attention to certain neuro-ophthalmic conditions which have occurred in patients on oral contraceptives, but at the same time to affirm that the relationship of the drug to the disease is still . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.