You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 73 No. 3, March 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Two Views of Choroidal Angiosclerosis

D. G. C.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73(3):309.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Clinicians and pathologists differ widely in their concepts of choroidal angiosclerosis. Most clinicians equate this term with white streaking of the larger choroidal vessels and assume—if I interpret their assumptions properly—microscopic examination to reveal occlusive changes similar to those of arteriosclerosis elsewhere in the body. This clinical manifestation of "choroidal angiosclerosis" is most marked and most regularly seen in tapetoretinal degenerations such as retinitis pigmentosa and macular (areolar) degeneration. Yet histologic examination of the choroidal vessels in these conditions has failed to show the anticipated changes. The fact that the white streaking disappears abruptly as the vessels pass beneath the pigment epithelium and choriocapillaris suggests it may be an artifactual appearance due to loss of the overlying layers.

In contrast to clinicians, most pathologists equate choroidal angiosclerosis with a hyalinization of the intermediate-sized vessels and of the choriocapillaris such as one sees characteristically with malignant hypertension. The pathologists would expect— . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1965 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.