You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 72 No. 5, November 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Human Lens Proteins Examined by Immunochemical and Ultracentrifugal Techniques

A. LEURE duPREE, MSc; J. LITTLE, MD; J. LANGMAN, MD, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1964;72(5):660-666.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

The development of new immunochemical techniques has greatly enhanced our knowledge of the soluble proteins of the lens. Rao et al,1 using Oudin's agar diffusion test,2 demonstrated that bovine lens extract contains six soluble antigenic components, while François et al,3 combining agar diffusion and electrophoretic techniques,4 found eight such components. Halbert and Fitzgerald,5 working with the Ouchterlony agar diffusion technique,6,7 found five antigenic components in the lens of the frog and four in that of the fish.

Maisel and Langman,8 and Konyukhov and Lishtvan,9 using the agar diffusion test, were able to demonstrate the presence of 7 to 13 antigenic components in the adult chick lens. In later work, Langman and Maisel10 succeeded in isolating the three main proteins of the chick lens ({alpha}-crystallin: molecular weight (MW) approx 1,000,000; β-crystallin: MW 200,000 to 300,000; and {gamma}-crystallin: MW 60,000), and suggested . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Montreal, Canada

Department of Anatomy, McGill University.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 22, 1964.

This investigation was supported by grants (B-3245 and NB 03425, -02, and -03) from the National Institute of Health, United States Public Health Service, and from the Medical Research Council of Canada.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.