You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 72 No. 2, August 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postoperative Choroidal Detachment

T. A. MAKLEY, JR., MD; ROBERT WILLARD, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1964;72(2):234-237.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Choroidal detachment is not uncommon after an intraocular operation. The condition is usually associated with a shallow anterior chamber and low intraocular pressure.

The prognosis is good, and few eyes have been studied histologically. The following case is presented because it was obtained quite early and was removed with the presumptive diagnosis of "intraocular melanoma."

Report of Case

A 66-year-old man consulted an ophthalmologist because of severe pain and loss of vision in his left eye for three weeks. The visual acuity was counting fingers. The eye was congested, the cornea was steamy, and the intraocular pressure was above 80 mm Hg (Schiotz). The fundus could not be seen because of the steamy cornea. Treatment with acetazolamide (Diamox) and pilocarpine brought the pressure down promptly. In three days the vision improved and the tension was 25 mm Hg (Schiøtz).

The pressure gradually rose to 60 mm Hg and did not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Columbus, Ohio

Department of Ophthalmology, Ohio State University.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Jan 29, 1964.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.