You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 71 No. 4, April 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reconstruction of the Eye Socket

BYRON SMITH, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1964;71(4):517-519.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Contracture or poor development of the eye socket is one of the most perplexing problems in ophthalmic plastic surgery. In general the best treatment for enlargement of the socket is expansion treatment by graduated conformers or expanders over a prolonged period. Considerable variation exists in the size, shape, consistency, and technique of applying pressure to encourage growth of the socket. Cutting surgery is never indicated, provided expansion of the socket is possible by a nonsurgical means. Surgery for this condition is difficult, unpredictable, and at times unreliable. Unfortunately, certain deformities of the socket are not amenable to expansion treatment and must be treated by surgery if an artificial eye is to be retained.

The normal lining of the socket is composed of conjunctiva. This moist smooth surface is a most efficient type of covering. Other sources of mucous membrane are available if insufficient conjunctiva becomes a problem. Grafts of mucous . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New York


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 31, 1963.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.