You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 70 No. 4, October 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery

ed 3. By Sidney A. Fox, MS (Ophthalmology) MD, FACS. Price, $19.50. Pp 493, with 232 illustrations. Grune & Stratton, 381 Park Ave South, New York, 1963.

Arthur Gerard DeVoe, MD, Reviewer

Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;70(4):585-586.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Books on ophthalmic surgery and particularly ophthalmic plastic surgery are frequently difficult for the reader to evaluate since in most instances the author usually compiles from the literature all procedures which have been published as providing the surgical solution for the defect under question. Not infrequently these are supported by line drawings of surgical maneuvers which, although capable of execution on paper, are totally inadequate when applied to the patient. Dr. Fox is to be commended in describing "with a few noted exceptions" only those procedures which he has utilized himself. The reviewer believes that this type of book is far more effective than the encyclopedic compendium which purports to cover all phases of a subject and yet leaves the reader uncertain as to which technical procedure the author has found most satisfactory. The present edition is far more comprehensive, better organized, and more useful than its predecessors. The author . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.