You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 70 No. 2, August 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aniseikonia

A Present Appraisal and Some Practical Considerations

CONRAD BERENS, MD; ROBERT E. BANNON

Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;70(2):181-188.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

It is 25 years since Lancaster1 coined the word "aniseikonia" to describe unequal ocular images which Ames and his colleagues at Dartmouth had investigated as a result of researches initially concerned with basic studies in physiological optics.

Although many careful studies5-23 have revealed relief of symptoms from wearing aniseikonic corrections, especially asthenopia and certain types of headache aggravated by close work, in only a comparatively small percentage of refractions is aniseikonia considered as a concomitant factor. Because it is our belief that correction of aniseikonia should be a part of the service provided patients, we thought it important to call attention to the current literature on aniseikonia and to point out some simple, inexpensive, though approximate, procedures to be followed in the measurement and correction of aniseikonia.

Donders2 (1864) was, no doubt, the first to discuss the difference in retinal image size due to the spectacle . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Buffalo, N. Y.

Consultant, Instrument Division, American Optical Company, Buffalo 15, NY. Formerly: Supervising Aniseikonic Clinician and Assistant Professor in Applied Physiological Optics, Dartmouth Eye Institute, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr. Bannon).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Jan 26, 1963.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.