You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 69 No. 6, June 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fast-Acting Applanation Tonometers

I. The Probable Explanation of the Second Order Effects and the Discrepancy Between Fast- and Slow-Acting Tonometers as Illustrated with a New Electronic Tonometer

HAROLD P. SCHULZ, MD; GEORGE F. HILTON, MD; W. K. McEWEN, PhD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;69(6):717-721.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

In 1885 Imbert1 (also cf. Prijot2), set forth the basic theory of applanation tonometry. Two factors stood in the way of a practical solution to the problem: (1) The force against the area of applanation must be large enough to be measured, but the area must not be so large as to raise appreciably the intraocular pressure. (2) The bending force of the cornea and the surface tension of the tears must be obviated or corrected. Goldmann3,4 devised a practical solution to the problem by choosing an area of applanation which would satisfy Condition 1 above and at the same time would balance out the opposing forces of Condition 2. Mackay and Marg5 approached the solution by employing a sensitive transducer and feedback mechanism to provide a small area of applanation and allowing the bending force of the cornea and surface tension of the tears . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

San Francisco


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Sept. 21, 1962.

Contribution from the Department of Ophthalmology and the Francis I. Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco Medical Center.

Supported in part by the Council for Research in Glaucoma and Allied Diseases and in part by a grant from the Committee on Research of The University of California San Francisco Medical Center.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.