You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 69 No. 1, January 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

PATHOLOGIC EXAMINATION OF TISSUE INCIDENTALLY REMOVED AT SURGERY

Lawrence R. Dame, M.D.
78 Federal St. Greenfield, Mass.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1963;69(1):141.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor:

—Ophthalmologists have long supported the principle of improving the standards for surgery in their field. They have also consistently objected to increasing the costs of surgical care to their patients, and the paper work to themselves and their staffs, of sending scleral buttons, iris fragments, muscle portions, etc., to the laboratory.

Recently a pathology laboratory in a university-connected clinic brought this problem to acute attention by insisting that all tissues must be submitted for pathological examination at the useless charge of $15 to the patient.

A request for definitive information was submitted to Dr. Kenneth B. Babcock, Director of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals, who replied:

I hasten to answer your letter because the statement made by the University Hospital at... is absolutely wrong. The Joint Commission has never in its history required that all tissues removed have a microscopic examination. We have said almost . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.