You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 68 No. 3, September 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Scleral Buckling Procedures

VI. Further Notes on Silicone in Primary Operations

C. D. J. REGAN, M.D.; C. L. SCHEPENS, M.D.; I. D. OKAMURA, M.D.; R. J. BROCKHURST, M.D.; J. W. McMEEL, M.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;68(3):313-328.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

The variations encountered in individual cases of retinal detachment make the development of one "standard" operation applicable to all detachments unlikely. Nevertheless it is possible to study the efficiency of various surgical procedures in large numbers of cases and to develop operations shown to be the most effective in certain broad categories of patients with retinal detachments of similar types. Such studies have been the basis of this series of papers1-5 reporting the evolution of the scleral buckling operation. Each publication has presented the principles involved and has described the details of technique used as of the time of writing. Because better materials are constantly becoming available, and because further refinements in technique are continually being tested and adopted, some procedures already had been revised by the time their descriptions were published. This situation is unavoidable, however, particularly if the effects of modifications are to be adequately assessed . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Boston

From the Department of Clinical Eye Research, Institute of Biological and Medical Sciences, Retina Foundation; Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication March 1, 1962.

This work was supported by a PHS Research Grant B3489 of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, U.S. Public Health Service and by the Eye Research Fund, Inc., of the Massachusetts Lions.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.