You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 5, November 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (100)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Photosensitization of the Eye with Methoxsalen

II. Chronic Effects

THOMAS M. CLOUD, M.D.; RAOUF HAKIM, Ph.D.; A. CLARK GRIFFIN, Ph.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(5):689-694.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

In the first part of this study1 it was shown that guinea pig eyes can be sensitized to an otherwise harmless kind of energy, long ultraviolet light, with a photosensitizing substance, methoxsalen.* (Since publication of the first paper, additional evidence has been presented that the action spectrum of methoxsalen peaks in the long ultraviolet range.)2,3 In the first study guinea pigs were exposed to long ultraviolet light continuously for 24 hours. Half of them, the test animals, received methoxsalen intraperitoneally one hour prior to exposure. The harmless nature of long ultraviolet was demonstrated by the controls, none of which sustained ocular injury. The photosensitizing effect of methoxsalen was demonstrated by the test animals, none of which escaped ocular injury. The damage produced was acute and severe. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether a chronic effect could be produced by the daily administration of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Houston, Texas

From the Department of Biochemistry, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May, 1960.

Supported in part by a grant from the Robert A. Welch Foundation, Houston, Texas, and the Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Mich.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.