You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 4, October 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Purification of Hyaluronidase from Bovine Testes

SAMUEL M. MOZERSKY, Ph.D.; BRADLEY R. STRAATSMA, M.D.; JOHN M. STEFFY, B.A.; ANN McFARLIN, B.A.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(4):534-538.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

The potential value of hyaluronidase as an agent for enzymatic degradation of hyaluronic acid in the eye has led to efforts to purify and characterize this substance. The various techniques of protein purification that have been applied to the preparation of hyaluronidase from bovine testes include: (a) ammonium sulfate precipitation,1,2 (b) fractionation in aqueous solution with salts of heavy metals, viz., CuSO4 and Pb(OAc)2,2 (c) electrophoresis in free solution,2 (d) cold ethanol fractionation,3 and (e) chromatography on the cation exchange resin, IRC-50.4,5

It appeared to us that the application of a few additional techniques now available might permit one to obtain an enzyme preparation of considerably higher specific activity than any hitherto available. Some of the methods listed would then serve for the initial stages of the purification process.

A preliminary investigation in this laboratory showed that methods (a) and (b) would . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, and the Department of Physiological Chemistry, University of California Medical Center, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 12, 1961.

This investigation was supported by grants-in-aid from (1) the Doheny Eye Foundation, (2) the Knights Templar Eye Foundation, Inc., and (3) the U.S. Public Health Service, No. B-2327.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.