You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 3, September 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Mydriasis Provocative Test

MILES A. GALIN, M.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(3):353-355.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Results of provocative testing in angle-closure glaucoma are presumed to depend on mechanical obstruction to the egress of aqueous.1,2 Recent refinements of this test have hinged on recording a reduction in outflow facility prior to any elevation in intraocular pressure.3-5 Several investigators have indicated that following mydriasis a reduction in outflow facility of 25%-30% is strongly suggestive of angle-closure glaucoma. It is the purpose of this communication to present evidence that elevation of intraocular pressure and reduction of out-flow facility may occur reproducibly in certain patients with wide, unencumbered angles.

Materials and Methods

Patients for this study were obtained from the Glaucoma Research Service of the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. When our interest in this study became known, several patients with similar findings were referred for study by private ophthalmologists. In this manner 9 patients were obtained who clearly showed the reported effects. Three of these patients . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New York

Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology) the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 1, 1961.

Aided, in part, by grants from The National Society for the Prevention of Blindness, and The National Council to Combat Blindness.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.