You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 3, September 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tropicamide: Comparative Cycloplegic Effects

BERNARD C. GETTES, M.D.; OWEN BELMONT, M.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(3):336-340.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Tropicamide* (Mydriacyl) is the cycloplegic agent most recently introduced into this country. This, together with cyclopentolate hydrochloride {dagger} (Cyclogyl) and homatropine, provides us with 3 so-called short acting cycloplegic drugs for refraction. Inasmuch as these preparations are all parasympatholytic drugs and pharmacologically related, it was decided to evaluate and compare them as to: (1) the effectiveness of cycloplegia, (2) the duration of cycloplegia, and (3) the rapidity of return of accommodation.

Emphasis is placed on the clarification of what constitutes adequate and effective cycloplegia. It has been asserted previously by Prangen,1 and maintained by Gettes,2,3 that there must be less than 2.50 D. of residual accommodation at the time of retinoscopy and examination for a cycloplegic agent to be effective. If the examiner merely desires pupillary dilatation or is unconcerned with the amount of paralysis of accommodation, he should resort to agents which do not affect the ciliary . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Philadelphia

Senior Assistant Surgeon, Wills Eye Hospital, formerly Chief, Refraction Department (Dr. Gettes); Assistant Surgeon, Wills Eye Hospital, Chief, Refraction Department (Dr. Belmont).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 20, 1961.

Presented at the 13th Annual Clinical Conference of the Wills Eye Hospital.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.