You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 1, July 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Conjunctival Sign of Sickle-Cell Disease

DAVID PATON, M.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(1):90-94.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The purpose of this paper is to report a characteristic appearance of the bulbar conjunctival circulation as a reliable sign in the diagnosis of clinically significant sickle-cell disease. Although general physical examination can offer many clues, it is proposed here that no other clinical observation establishes that diagnosis with as much certainty. Even routine laboratory tests are occasionally inconclusive, for sickled red blood cells are found in patients with the asymptomatic sickle-cell trait.

In 1957, Goodman, von Sallmann, and Holland1 described for the first time vascular loops and segments which were found near the limbus in several patients with heterozygous sickle-cell disease. Bulbar conjunctival changes have since been commented on by Lieb, Geeraets, and Guerry2 in their monograph on sickle-cell retinopathy. In that report, the following conjunctival abnormalities were noted: icterus, telangiectasis, vascular stasis, and sausagelike dilatations. Their observations indicated a rather low incidence: Of 51 patients with . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Baltimore

From the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 13, 1960.

This paper was presented at the Wilmer Residents Meeting, April, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.