You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 66 No. 1, July 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (65)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cell Production and Migration in the Epithelial Layer of the Lens

CALVIN HANNA, Ph.D.; JAMES E. O'BRIEN, Ph.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;66(1):103-107.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The epithelial layer of the lens has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several types of cataract.1 These types, which are progressive, slow to develop, and usually nonreversible, include various radiation cataracts such as those caused by ultraviolet, infrared, x-ray, {gamma}-ray, neutron, β-ray, and radiomimetic agents such as busulfan (Myleran).* In a number of animal experiments where the germinative zone of the lens epithelium was selectively irradiated a slow forming opacity was found, whereas selective irradiation in other areas of the lens required much larger doses to produce the same effect.2-4 These results give strong support to the idea that the lens epithelial cells, especially those cells of the proliferative zone, are directly involved in the developing opacity. The sequence of postulated events leading to the formation of radiation cataracts as first suggested by Rohrschneider2 and outlined in a book by Duke-Elder5 are as follows: "The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Burlington, Vt.

Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont College of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication March 18, 1961.

This study was supported in part by funds made available by a Senior Research Fellowship SF-156 (Dr. Hanna) from the U.S. Public Health Service and by a Grant-in-Aid from the Bob Hope Fight for Sight Fund of the National Council to Combat Blindness, Inc., New York City.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.