You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 65 No. 4, April 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Catgut Allergy in Eye Muscle Surgery

II. Correlation and Comparison of Eye Reaction and Skin Test After the Use of Plain and Chromicized Catgut

LEONARD APT, M.D.; FRANK D. COSTENBADER, M.D.; MARSHALL M. PARKS, M.D.; DAN G. ALBERT, M.D.

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;65(4):474-480.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

In a recent paper,1 the authors reported the observation and study of an unusual ocular response to eye muscle surgery in some children, characterized by itchiness of the eye, chemosis and hyperemia of the conjunctiva, and edema of the eyelids. This response was classified as immediate if seen within 24-48 hours after operation and delayed if manifest after approximately 1 week. Originally, we had not been able to associate this response with the type of procedure, extent of the surgery, or the local administration of ophthalmic medication, or to ascribe it specifically to the presence of a foreign body. In the absence of evidence to suggest a causative role for any of these factors, the possibility of an allergic reaction to catgut was considered. A piece of the plain catgut suture used for the extraocular muscles was buried intradermally in the forearm of 219 patients at the time . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Washington, D.C.

From Children's Hospital, Washington, D.C. Special Fellow in Ophthalmology (BT-438C1), National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness during course of this study. Present address: Division of Ophthalmology, U.C.L.A. Medical Center, Los Angeles 24 (Dr. Apt).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Dec. 19, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.