You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 65 No. 3, March 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Corneal Sensitivity After Cataract Extraction

K. E. SCHIRMER, M.D.; L. D. MELLOR, F.L.A.L.T., S.T. (Can.)

Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;65(3):433-436.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In his paper on quantitative assessment of corneal sensitivity, Boberg-Ans1 mentions the decrease of sensitivity after scarring in the adjacent cornea. A similar reduction of sensitivity after cataract sections has been recorded.2 The extent, the duration, and the distribution of the lowered sensitivity seems of interest, especially in relation to the tolerance of contact lenses. Corneal dystrophy after cataract surgery, comparison of corneal and limbal sections, are aspects worthy of consideration in regard to their corneal sensitivity.

Method

For the examination of corneal sensitivity, a modified version of the method as described by Boberg-Ans3 was used. Instead of 1 nylon thread of a 00000 dermalon suture, a double thread of approximately 50 mm. was used, fusing the ends by heating over a Bunsen burner. By feeding the double thread into a thin polyethylene tube, it was possible to change the length of the nylon thread and thus . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Montreal, Canada; Sudbury, Ont., Canada

From the Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Canada (Dr. Schirmer).; The Department of Pathology and Biochemistry, Sudbury General Hospital, Sudbury, Ont. (Dr. Mellor).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Sept. 30, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.