You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 4, April 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Critical Analysis of the Closed System Technique for Lens Culture

Part I

BERNARD SCHWARTZ, M.D., Ph.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1960;63(4):593-606.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

The lens has long been recognized as an ideal experimental material for the study of the metabolism and permeability of an organ in vitro. Because of its avascularity and lack of nerve supply, as well as the fact that it is surrounded by a capsule and therefore can be easily removed and manipulated, the lens has been used increasingly in the past 10 years by many investigators. Particular interest has been centered on the technique of lens culture whereby the lens is studied in vitro for considerable periods of time up to several days.

It is the purpose of this paper to examine crtically the techniques of lens culture and to point out that a more physiological approach to the study of lens metabolism and permeability can be obtained by using a culture system based on the perfusion technique.

Review of Literature

One of the earliest attempts to use . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Iowa City

From the Departments of Physiology and Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, State University of Iowa.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Nov. 23, 1959.

Present address of author: Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn 3, N.Y.

Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Physiology in the Graduate College of the State University of Iowa.

This study was supported in part by a Fight for Sight Award from the National Council to Combat Blindness Inc., New York and was carried out during the tenure of a Special Clinical Traineeship (BT-322) National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness, United States Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.