You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 63 No. 2, February 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Corneal Rust Ring

Etiology and Histology

BERNARD D. ZUCKERMAN, M.D.; THEODORE W. LIEBERMAN, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1960;63(2):254-265.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

One of the problems commonly confronting the ophthalmologist as well as the general practitioner is that of the corneal foreign body. With the utilization of high speed drills and other mechanical devices in our modern era of industrialization, the frequency of eye injuries secondary to embedded particles remains high despite the increasing use of safety precautions.1 Fragments buried in the corneal substance represent by far the commonest industrial ocular accidents, serious enough to reach a statistical reporting center. In a study by Callahan2,3 of 404 eye injuries occurring in an aircraft plant, keratic foreign bodies accounted for 37% of the total number. Gronvoll and Ohlson4 demonstrated that the vast majority of these particles are centrally located in an area which represents approximately only one quarter of the total keratic surface. The importance of the prevention of permanent corneal damage becomes that much more significant because of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New Haven, Conn.; New York

From the Section of Ophthalmology, Yale University School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Sept. 14, 1959.

Aided by the Connecticut Lions Eye Research Foundation (Dr. Zuckerman) and a Fight for Sight award of the National Council to Combat Blindness, Inc., New York (Dr. Lieberman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.