You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 3, September 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Scleral Buckling Procedures

IV. Reoperations Following Scleral Bucklings

I. D. OKAMURA, M.D.; C. L. SCHEPENS, M.D.; R. J. BROCKHURST, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;62(3):445-458.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The first and second articles of this series contain a description of the techniques of scleral buckling when performed as a primary procedure, and the third article deals with difficulties in reoperations following other types of retinal surgery. This article describes techniques used when a reoperation follows a scleral buckling procedure. A more detailed discussion of the indications for procedures used in reoperations will be the subject of our next article.

One of the greatest dangers in reoperating after a diathermy operation and, to less degree, after a scleral resection is that sciera treated with diathermy is edematous, Prone to rupture, and adherent to orbital Scar tissue. After a scleral buckling, on the other hand, the treated portion of the sciera is folded in and protected by the polyethylene tube. Adhesions between sclera and orbital soft tissues are less dense and easier to dissect. This reduces the danger of accidentally . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Boston

From the Retina Foundation, Department of Ophthalmology of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Feb. 23, 1959.

Paper 78, Retina Foundation.

This work was supported by the Dazian Foundation.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.