You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 5, May 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Emergency War Surgery, NATO Handbook.

Price, $2.25. Pp. 411, including Index, with 18 illustrations. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1958.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;61(5):844.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This monograph on emergency war surgery very admirably fulfills the goal implied in its title. The general principles of various phases of emergency care of war injuries are outlined and very concisely discussed from a present-day point of view. The principles of mass casualties, the management of burns, shock and resuscitation, control of bleeding, and the management of bone and chest injuries are nicely reviewed.

The short section on the emergency management of injuries of the eye covers important principles of first-aid care of ocular injuries. Inexperienced persons are cautioned against manipulations of an injured eye. When penetrating injuries are suspected, litter evacuation is recommended. General surgeons are advised against removal of an eye unless (1) the globe is completely disorganized or (2) its removal is necessary as part of the general management of an extensive wound of the face. One might question the advisability of the first indication because . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.