You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 61 No. 5, May 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Multiple-Pattern Method of Visual Field Examination

A Five-Year Evaluation of Its Effectiveness as a Visual Field Screening Technique

DAVID O. HARRINGTON, M.D.; MILTON FLOCKS, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1959;61(5):755-765.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Since its first presentation before the American Ophthalmological Society,1 in 1953, the multiple-pattern method of visual field examination has been widely accepted and used in clinics and in private practice. It has proved to be an effective technique for visual field screening in mass examinations of personnel in industry, in the armed forces, in driver-testing, and in glaucomadetection surveys in various parts of the country. There is now a considerable literature on the method.

Much data has been accumulated through personal communication with a large number of the more than 500 users of the visual field screener. Some of this material was collected in response to a questionnaire. Numerous unsolicited reports have been submitted by users who attested to the accuracy and speed with which the method was able to detect a wide variety of visual field defects, later confirmed by standard perimetric techniques.

We have considerably enlarged our . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

San Francisco

From the Division of Ophthalmology, University of California School of Medicine, the Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford Unversity School of Medicine, and the U. S. Veterans Administration Hospital.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 6, 1958.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.