This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JOHN W. HENDERSON, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;60(2):249-250.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In October, 1951, at the annual session of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, a symposium on retinal detachment was presented. This symposium was of particular note because of the concise but complete coverage of such a broad subject, the renowned status of the speakers, and the large audience that attended the presentation. One of the speakers who participated in this symposium is now the president of this section, Dr. Dohrmann K. Pischel. Because of Dr. Pischel's particular interest in retinal detachment, the panel discussion of this subject today is very timely. I thought it appropriate, therefore, to reevaluate Dr. Pischel's remarks of 1951 in light of the developments that have occurred in the past six and one-half years and compare the clinical results obtained with the older technics and with the newer ones.

In the symposium of 1951 Dr. Pischel¹ discussed the treatment phase of retinal detachment . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Rochester, Minn.

Section of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?