You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 5, May 1958 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

On the Correction of Unilateral Aphakia with Contact Lenses

KENNETH N. OGLE, Ph.D.; HERMANN M. BURIAN, M.D.; ROBERT E. BANNON, B.S.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;59(5):639-652.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

During the past two decades, but especially during the last 10 years, there has appeared in the literature an increasing number of articles and discussions dealing with the clinical results of the correction of unilateral aphakia with contact lenses.

Certain findings of clinical interest emerge from the study of these reports. One impression is that aphakic eyes would seem to tolerate contact lenses better than eyes not operated on.1,9,11,20,21 Goar attributes this to a reduction in corneal sensitivity of the operated-on eyes. On the other hand, Constantine and McLean do not think that there is such a reduction in the corneal sensitivity of the eyes of their patients. If, instead, the better tolerance could be attributed to the fact that these patients received sufficient benefit from the wearing of contact lenses to increase their willingness to wear them, this might be considered a strong argument in favor of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.; Iowa City; Southbridge, Mass.

Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation (Dr. Ogle). The Mayo Foundation is part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota. Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, State University of Iowa (Dr. Burian). Bureau of Visual Science, American Optical Company (Mr. Bannon).


Footnotes

Received for publication July 31, 1957.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1958 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.