This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Preliminary Report

MAYNARD C. WHEELER, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;59(4):603-606.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Anyone who has attempted to analyze the data from a series of motility records is painfully aware of what a bafflingly difficult job it is. Yet some of us cling to the belief that it is only by such analysis that we can learn the value of various types of treatment.

For a number of years the use of punch cards has seemed in theory to be the logical solution to this problem, but I now find that this is by no means an easy solution. Thus far I have been able to learn of only two attempts to use punch cards for motility records: a short-lived project by Hermann Burian a number of years ago in Hanover, N. H., and a presently continuing one by Lloyd Morgan, in Toronto. As no report of either of these has yet been published, I feel justified in recording my experience in a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
New York

From the Institute of Ophthalmology and Vanderbilt Clinic, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center.

Footnotes
Received for publication June 29, 1957.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?