You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 1, January 1958 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CORRESPONDENCE
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA WITH NORMAL ELECTRORETINOGRAM

Hermann M. Burian, M.D.
State University of Iowa University Hospitals Iowa City

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1958;59(1):149.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor:

—If electroretinography has any place in clinical ophthalmology at all, then this place is surely in the differential diagnosis of the tapetoretinal degenerations. The knowledge in this field has recently been splendidly summarized by Franceschetti and Dieterle (Elektroretinographie, in Hamburg Symposium, Bibl. Ophth., Fasc. 48, Basel and New York, S. Karger, 1957). In this article it is made clear by many personal contributions of the authors that an extinguished electroretinogram is not only pathognomonic for chorioretinal abiotrophies but essential in establishing the correct diagnosis in difficult or doubtful cases.

In view of this situation, it would be very significant if it could be shown that there are well-substantiated cases of retinitis pigmentosa in which there is an electroretinogram of normal shape, though possibly of reduced amplitude. Unfortunately, the case presented by Skeehan, Passmore, and Armington (A. M. A. ARCH. OPHTH. 57:536 [April] 1957) is not a well-substantiated . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1958 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.