You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 5, May 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glaucoma: Reports of a Symposium Organized by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.

Edited by Sir Stewart Duke-Elder. Price, $7.50. Pp. 380, including index, appendices, and bibliography. Charles C Thomas, Publisher, 301 E. Lawrence Ave., Springfield, Ill., 1955.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956;55(5):750-752.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The Council for International Organization of Medical Sciences periodically organizes symposia on various medical subjects. The meeting of the XVIIth International Congress of Ophthalmology, opening in Montreal, offered an excellent opportunity for the Council to organize a symposium on glaucoma, and accordingly a number of the foremost contributors to this subject, including anatomists, physiologists, pathologists, and clinicians were invited to meet in the Alpine Inn at St. Marguerite, in the Laurentian Mountains of Canada, ahead of the official opening of the Congress, in September, 1954.

This book, which consists of their deliberations, forms one of the most valuable contributions to our knowledge of glaucoma which has appeared within the last few years, consisting, as it does, of papers by experts in the field together with a frank discussion by their peers. Regardless of whether there emerged any unity of opinion—and, surprising to say, there seemed to be far more agreement . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.