You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 5, May 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bilateral Indentation of Cornea and Lens

A Unique Developmental Anomaly

SAUL LIVANT, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956;55(5):681-684.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Developmental abnormalities of curvature of cornea or lens are usually regular and possess symmetry; that is, the curvature is either increased or decreased with a regularity that permits of measurement, or at least description in geometric terms. In microcornea, cornea plana, and microphakia, the radius of curvature of the entire surface is either increased or decreased to a visible extent beyond the normal range. In keratoconus and anterior and posterior lentiglobus, only a circumscribed portion of the surface shows the deviation, but the deviation itself, with the exception of some rare cases of peripheral posterior lentiglobus,1 is sufficiently regular to be described fairly accurately as either conical or hemispherical in shape. On the other hand, instances of circumscribed abnormalities of curvature possessing no geometric regularity are rare. The following case presents several such irregularities of the surface curvature and is recorded because of its uniqueness and the problems it . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Brooklyn

From the V. A. Regional Office.


Footnotes

Received for publication Feb. 2, 1956.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.