You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 3, March 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Miosis in Argyll Robertson Syndrome and Related Pupillary Disorders

OTTO LOWENSTEIN, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956;55(3):356-370.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

According to the classical description,* the Argyll Robertson syndrome is characterized by the following essential features: (1) the absence or diminution of the pupillary reflex to light; (2) an active or hyperactive pupillary contraction to near vision, and (3) the presence of miosis.

The cause of the miosis in the Argyll Robertson syndrome and in related pupillary disturbances has never been satisfactorily explained. In the abundant literature, extending over almost a century, two main theories have evolved:

  1. The miosis is due to an interruption of the sympathetic dilator fibers.
  2. The miosis is due to irritation within the parasympathetic reflex arc.

It is the purpose of this paper to discuss, on the basis of pupillographic and pharmacodynamic tests, the mechanism by which miosis is produced in the Argyll Robertson and related pupillary syndromes. An attempt will be made to clarify some of the basic problems which have perpetuated the controversies involved. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New York

From the Department of Ophthalmology (Laboratory of Pupillography), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and the Institute of Ophthalmology, Presbyterian Hospital.


Footnotes

Received for publication Nov. 30, 1955.

This work was supported by the Harriman Fund and by a grant from the U. S. Public Health Service (B-253 C2, Sens. Dis. 5).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.