You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 2, February 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

On the Precise Objective Determination of Eye Movements

GEORGE T. TANI, M.D.; KENNETH N. OGLE, Ph.D.; REX W. WEAVER, M.D.; THEODORE G. MARTENS, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956;55(2):174-185.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In the usual course of a prism-vergence test, the eyes are slowly forced to converge (or diverge) until the subject reports that he sees the test object double. Then the prismatic power is slowly decreased, and, at a certain point, fusion of the double images is suddenly regained. Just at this moment when recovery of fusion takes place, the two double images must have attained a certain critical separation, which is capable of initiating fusional movements of the eyes to overcome the diplopia. If, just at the moment of recovery, one of the double images falls in the fovea of one eye, the other image will necessarily fall extrafoveally on the retina of the other eye at a certain angle, an angle of disparity, which is one dimension of the so-called perimacular fusional area.1 It has been generally assumed that in the prism-vergence tests, as soon as the images . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.

Fellow in Ophthalmology (Dr. Tani); Section of Biophysics and Biophysical Research (Dr. Ogle); Fellow in Ophthalmology (Dr. Weaver), and Section of Ophthalmology (Dr. Martens), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.


Footnotes

Received for publication Nov. 14, 1955.

The broad body of data on which this paper was based constituted material from which Drs. Tani and Weaver produced theses submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ophthalmology.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.