You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 55 No. 1, January 1956 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Spear Cataract

LT. CHARLES O. PARKER, Jr., MC

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1956;55(1):23-24.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Vogt,1 in 1922, described an unusual type of congenital cataract with crystal formation under the name of "spear cataract." His patient was a 9-year-old child with bilateral lens changes. These changes consisted of many shiny crystalline needles projecting in various directions throughout the axial area of the lens, being grouped around denser central opacities and having no apparent relation to the anatomic structure of the lens. Some areas resembled a spiny plant; others resembled a caterpillar. Some of the crystals were iridescent; some were over a millimeter in length and were grouped in bundles resembling tyrosine crystals. One lens was extracted and subjected to chemical analysis, which showed a predominance of cystine.

Three years after this case was published, Romer * investigated the remainder of this family and discovered a marked tendency toward cataract formation. Out of 42 persons, in four generations, he found 10 with what appeared to be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

U.S.N.

From the Department of Ophthalmology, U. S. Naval Hospital.


Footnotes

Received for publication Oct. 19, 1955.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the writer's and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the view of the Navy Department or the Naval Service at large.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1956 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.