You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 6, December 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Some Effects of Ultrasonic Energy on the Rabbit Eye

CHRISTOPHER H. MOORE, M.D.; J. F. HERRICK, Ph.D.; THEODORE G. MARTENS, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955;54(6):922-930.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Considerable controversy and confusion appear in the literature regarding the effects of ultrasound on the eye because the exact conditions of the experimental procedures are not clearly defined and understood. Fischer1 has reviewed the biologic action of ultrasound, classifying the effects as thermal, mechanical, and chemical. Begui2 considered that knowledge of the physical characteristics of the different parts of the eye as they affect the propagation of ultrasonic waves would be useful. He measured the density and the viscosity in the refractive parts of the eye (aqueous, lens, and vitreous), together with the velocity of the ultrasonic waves and their absorption coefficient.

The purpose of our investigation was to observe the effects of ultrasonic energy on the structures of the eye of the rabbit. Observations were made on intact as well as on enucleated eyes. Different outputs of energy and various durations of exposure to ultrasound were . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.

Fellow in Ophthalmology, Mayo Foundation (Dr. Moore). Section of Biophysics (Dr. Herrick) and Section of Ophthalmology (Dr. Martens), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.


Footnotes

Received for publication Sept. 6, 1955.

A portion of this paper was read at the meeting of the Midwestern Section of the Association for Research in Ophthalmology, Rochester, Minn., April 30, 1955.

Abridgment of thesis submitted by Dr. Moore to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ophthalmology.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1955 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.