You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 3, March 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Retrobulbar Procaine Injection on Aqueous Humor Dynamics

ANDREW de ROETTH, Jr., M.D.; FRANK D. CARROLL, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955;53(3):399-403.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The retrobulbar injection of procaine has become almost a standard preoperative procedure in ophthalmology; yet its mode of action on the ocular tension is still unknown. Several recent papers * have described the effect of the retrobulbar injection of anesthetic agents on the intraocular pressure, both in normal and in glaucomatous eyes. Thus far, however, the interest of the research workers has centered mainly on the changes in the intraocular pressure, while other aspects of the aqueous humor dynamics were not considered. It was thought that by employing Grant's tonographic technique,3 further information might be obtained concerning the mode of action of the retrobulbar injection of anesthetic agents on the intraocular pressure and on other aspects of aqueous humor dynamics. Furthermore, this procedure might throw some light on the neurovascular theory of glaucoma, since the retrobulbar injection effectively blocks all or most of the nerve supply of the eye. Therefore, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New York

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, and the Institute of Ophthalmology, Presbyterian Hospital.


Footnotes

This study was supported in part by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Inc.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1955 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.