You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 52 No. 5, November 1954 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

OCULAR PENETRATION OF PROCAINE FOLLOWING SUBCONJUNCTIVAL INJECTION

HENRY E. SCHLEGEL, Jr., M.D.; KENNETH C. SWAN, M.D.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954;52(5):774-778.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THIS REPORT concerns one phase of a long-range investigation which has been directed toward development of more effective local anesthetic drugs and improved methods of their administration in ophthalmologic practice. In this particular study it has been our purpose to determine factors influencing the ocular penetration and distribution of procaine following subconjunctival injection. By ``subconjunctival" we refer to the issue which is under the epithelium of the bulbar conjunctiva but is external to Tenon's capsule. The distribution of anesthetic drugs following subcapsular injections will be investigated later.

Subconjunctival injections of procaine hydrochloride commonly are made if manipulation of the iris is to be required during ocular surgery; however, a review of the literature reveals no unanimity of opinion regarding the efficacy of such injections. Many surgeons advocate this method of anesthesia, whereas others feel that retrobulbar injection is superior for such operative procedures as iridectomy One per cent procaine hydrochloride . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PORTLAND, ORE.

From the Department of Ophthalmology, the Universiy of Oregon Medical School.


Footnotes

Part of a study conducted under a grant from the Argosy Foundation.

Read before the Section on Ophthalmology at the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Medical Association, San Francisco, June 22, 1954.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1954 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.