You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 47 No. 3, March 1952 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Pathology of the Eye

By Bernard Samuels, M.D. and Adalbert Fuchs, M.D. Price, $20.00. Pp. 420, with 418 illustrations, 191 in full color. Paul B. Hoeber, Inc. (Medical Book Department of Harper & Brothers), 49 E. 33 St., New York 16, N. Y., 1952.

AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1952;47(3):413-414.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The student who wishes an introduction to ophthalmic pathology will find Samuels' and Fuchs's textbook a practical and orthodox treatise. The arrangement is the standard one of first considering pathologic processes in general, then separately considering diseases of the anatomic parts of the eye, and finally describing some of the specific disease entities. Especially deserving of comment are the many beautiful colored plates of drawings, which the authors have preferred to photomicrographs to "emphasize the details in hand." The authors have drawn on their wide experience in Vienna and New York, adopting much of the techniques and many of the ideas that have been found successful in teaching ophthalmic pathology over the last half-century.

The student who wishes to go beyond the introduction to ophthalmic pathology will find this book unsatisfactory. Source material is not cited, and the authority for many of the opinions and statements is not given. The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1952 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.