You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 6, June 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CYCLOPIA WITH COMPLETE SEPARATION OF THE NEURAL AND MESODERMAL ELEMENTS OF THE EYE

Report of a Case

AELETA NICHOLS BARBER, Ph.D.; RUDOLPH J. MUELLING, Jr., B.S.

Arch Ophthal. 1950;43(6):989-1003.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

No STATEMENT regarding the incidence of cyclopia can be found in the literature despite the report of many cases over a long period of time. The specimen described in this paper represents the second case recorded at Charity Hospital, New Orleans, among 78,772 births during the period from 1938 through 1949.

The purpose of this paper is to present an anatomic study of a case of cyclopia showing fairly normal development of the orbit and sclera, though these structures were separated from the neural elements of the eye. These features have not previously been recorded in the literature.

HISTORICAL REVIEW

The literature dealing with cyclopia is extensive and will not be surveyed in detail. The principal theories regarding this anomaly may be summarized as follows:

  1. Fusion of two originally separate eyes due to arrest or retardation of growth (Meckel,1 1826).
  2. Persistence of a single vesicle (Huschke,2 1832.).
  3. Arrest of development
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

NEW ORLEANS

From the Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, and the Charity Hospital of Louisiana.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.