You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 5, May 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

STUDIES IN EXPERIMENTAL OCULAR TUBERCULOSIS

XIV. Failure of Aureomycin to Affect the Course of Ocular Tuberculosis

ALAN C. WOODS, M.D.; RONALD M. WOOD, Ph.D.; HOWARD A. NAQUIN, M.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1950;43(5):845-848.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

AUREOMYCIN has been shown to be successful in the treatment of a wide variety of infectious diseases.1 It has also been shown that resistance to aureomycin by many organisms is developed much more slowly and to a less degree than is resistance to streptomycin.2 Braley and Sanders3 reported 2 cases of tuberculous uveitis in which decided improvement followed treatment with aureomycin. Schoenbach4 treated 6 patients with various forms of tuberculosis. Two of these 6 showed improvement, 1 with a renal infection, the other with scrofulous draining sinuses of the neck.

Steenken and Wolinsky5 found the in vitro sensitivity of the H37 RV strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to vary from 5 to 40 micrograms per cubic centimeter, depending on the medium used for the assay. These authors treated the disease in guinea pigs with aureomycin and concluded that the course of the clinical disease was not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the Wilmer Ophthalmological Institute of the Johns Hopkins Hospital and University.


Footnotes

This investigation was supported in part by a grant from the John and Mary R. Markle Foundation.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.