You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 4, April 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Vision: Its Development in Infant, and Child.

By Arnold Gesell, M.D., Francis L. Ilg, M.D. and Glenna Bullis. Price, $6.50. Pp. 329, with 72 illustrations. Paul B. Hoeber, Inc. (Medical Book Department of Harper & Brothers), 49 E. 33d St., New York 16, 1949.

Arch Ophthal. 1950;43(4):792.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Prior to this study of Gesell, Ilg and Bullis, there have been remarkably few observations on the development of the visual functions in the infant and child, and none of the comprehensive scope that are reported in this book. The material is well presented, beautifully illustrated and organized into the main headings termed "The Growing Action System," "Developmental Optics" and "Developmental Appraisal." Each subdivision is arranged chronologically according to the age of the child. In keeping with the authors' intention to consider vision in relation to the development of the child as a whole, much of the material, especially in the first half of the book, deals with nonvisual functions.

The subject should be of interest to pediatricians, ophthalmologists, psychiatrists, parents and teachers. The value put on the book will vary according to what one expects from it. The present reviewer, an ophthalmologist, found it disappointing. In it he found . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.