You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 4, April 1950 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

GROWTH OF THE COMPONENTS OF THE HUMAN EYEBALL

II. Comparison of the Calculated Volumes of the Eyes of the Newborn and of Adults, and Their Components

RICHARD E. SCAMMON, Ph.D.; HARRY A. WILMER, M.D., Ph.D.

Arch Ophthal. 1950;43(4):620-637.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE CALCULATED volume of the eye of the newborn and that of an adult person are shown in table 1 of a previous paper (Wilmer and Scammon 1950) and are illustrated graphically here by charts 1 through 5.

The entire eyeball increases a little less than threefold between birth and maturity. This postnatal gain is very small as compared with that of the body as a whole, which increases about twentyfold, and is even less than that of the brain, which increases about three and a half times in weight. However, the gain of the eyeball is greater than that of most of the organs of special sense; for instance, the internal ear remains almost constant in size from late fetal life to maturity, and the olfactory mucous membrane is presumed to increase 10 per cent or less in area. There is little evidence of any increase in the organ . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BRANSON, MO.; Clinical Instructor in Medicine, Division of Neuropsychiatry, Stanford University PALO ALTO, CALIF.

From the Department of Neurology and Psychology, Palo Alto Clinic; formerly Fellow in Neurology and Psychiatry, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

The art work and graphs of this paper and of the earlier paper (Wilmer and Scammon, 1950) were executed by the Mayo Art Studio.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1950 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.